The new UI with "Close mode" grouping

Close mode as a group name reads a bit strange here, I would expect then having different modes to select but the configuration do not really offer that.

My suggestion would be to merge both settings into one line instead of grouping them e.g.

[ ] Close oldest if there are more than _____ editors open

Test Results

 1 818 files  + 1   1 818 suites  +1   1h 33m 19s ⏱️ - 6m 3s
 7 709 tests ± 0   7 481 ✅ + 1  228 💤 ± 0  0 ❌  - 1 
24 288 runs  +45  23 541 ✅ +36  747 💤 +10  0 ❌  - 1 

Results for commit 263f51c. ± Comparison against base commit a022116.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Close mode as a group name reads a bit strange here

What about "Closing behaviour"?

My suggestion would be to merge both settings into one line instead of grouping them

This is also a good idea.

This is how the new UI looks.

Can the input field made shorter so that the line doesn't get too long. I think place for around 4 chars would be sufficient.

What about changing the text to: "Close oldest editor if there more then ... editor open"

What does "oldest" mean?
a) The one that was open the longest time, or
b) the one where the time of last use is most far in the past?

I checked the current behaviour and noticed that it's not always the oldest editors that are being closed.

Use case 1:

If I have the following editors opened in order:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (1 being the oldest, focus is on 6)

• Set editor limit to 3
• Open editor 7
• The current available editors are 7, 2, 3

It deletes the latest 3 editors (6, 5, 4) and replaces the oldest editor.

Use case 2:

If I have the following editors opened in order:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (1 being the oldest, focus is on 5)

• Set editor limit to 3
• Open editor 7
• The current available editors are 7, 2, 3

It deletes the latest 3 editors (5, 6, 4) and replaces the oldest editor (1).

Use case 3:

If I have the following editors opened in order:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (1 being the oldest, focus is on 2)

• Set editor limit to 3
• Open editor 7
• The current available editors are 7, 3, 4

It deletes the latest 3 editors (2, 6, 5) and replaces the oldest editor (1).

Use case 4:

If I have the following editors opened in order:
1, 2, 3 (1 being the oldest, focus is on 3)

• Set editor limit to 3
• Open editor 4
• The current available editors are 4, 2, 3

It replaces the oldest editor (1).

Use case 5:

If I have the following editors opened in order:
1, 2, 3 (1 being the oldest, focus is on 1)

• Set editor limit to 3
• Open editor 4
• The current available editors are 1, 4, 3

It replaces the oldest editor (2).

It looks like its not always the oldest editors that are being closed.
So shall we change the text to something generic like:
Close editor(s) if there are more than ... editors open

Close editor(s) if there are more than ... editors open

yes.

Close editor(s) if there are more than ... editors open

yes. Maybe without the () simply "Close editors if..."

Reduced the size of the input field to show two characters, to match the text limit of 2 characters in the code.

merge commit are not allowed in PR. Can you pls. squash and rebase on top of current master please?